Observe 1 86 Circle
Click to reload page with unique web address for bookmarking or sharing current settings
86 Hays Cir, Silver Bay, MN is currently not for sale. Single-family home is a 2 bed, 1.0 bath property. This home was built in 1958 and last sold on for. View more property details, sales history and Zestimate data on Zillow.
Circumference of a circle: C = πd = 2πr The d represents the measure of the diameter, and r represents the measure of the radius. The diameter is always twice the radius, so either form of the equation works. Similarly, the formula for the area of a circle is tied to π and the radius. Area of a circle: A = πr 2 This formula reads, “Area equals pi are squared.”. To give an idea of what a 2 field of view is like compared to a 10 field of view, at a viewing distance of 50cm a 2 field of view would be a 1.7cm circle while a 10ذ field of view at the same distance would be an 8.8cm circle. Most of the information in this booklet is based on the 2ذ Standard Observer. Please, enter a numeric value greater than 0 and smaller than 854775807. The area, 'A', of the circle is 153.86 inches squared ' π ' is pi, an irrational number with a value of approximately 3.14 'r' is the radius, which is what we are solving for here Plugging in, we get: 153.86 = (3.14)r 2.
✕ clear settings
Related Tools
User Guide
This tool will calculate the diameter of a circle from the area, and will convert different measurement units for area and diameter.
Formula
The formula used to calculate the circle diameter is:
ø = 2 x √(A / π)
Symbols
- ø = Circle diameter
- A = Circle area
- π = Pi = 3.14159…
Area of Circle
Enter the area contained within a circle.
Diameter of Circle
This is the diameter of a circle that corresponds to the specified area.
Introduction
This is an article to hopefully give an understanding to Euler's magnificent equation:
$$ e^{itheta} = cos( theta ) + i cdot sin( theta ) $$
This equation is usually proved using the Taylor series expansion for the given functions, but this approach fails to give an understanding to the equation and the ramification for the behavior of complex numbers. Instead an intuitive approach is taken that culminates in a graphical understanding of the equation.
Complex Numbers
The variable $ i $ stands for the square root of negative one. This is the American convention. The European convention uses the letter $ j $. An imaginary number is $ i $ multiplied by a real scalar. The term imaginary is a little unfortunate in that it is a bit misleading, being synonymous with non-existent. From a Mathematical perspective, $ i $ is necessary to bring closure to the square root operation. The first obvious place a need pops up is the employment of the quadratic formula.
A complex number is the sum of a real number and an imaginary number. The complex plane is a representation of the entire set of complex numbers consisting of a Cartesian coordinate system with the horizontal axis representing the real component and the vertical axis representing the imaginary component by traditional convention. The complex number $ z = a + b cdot i $, where $ a $ and $ b $ are reals, is represented by the point $ (a,b) $ on the Cartesian plane. Because of this, complex addition is similar to vector addition, and scalar multiplication is also the same, but this is not true for multiplication. Multiplying two complex numbers is not the same as taking the dot product of the corresponding vectors.
The Unit Circle
The magnitude of a complex number is the distance from the number on the plane to the origin. Thanks to the Pythagorean theorem it is simple to calculate the magnitude:
$$ a + b cdot i = sqrt{ a^{2} + b^{2} }. $$
The unit circle is the set of complex numbers whose magnitude is one. On the complex plane they form a circle centered at the origin with a radius of one. It includes the value 1 on the right extreme, the value $ i $ at the top extreme, the value -1 at the left extreme, and the value $ -i $ at the bottom extreme.
Integer Powers of i
The powers of $ i $ form a pattern that start to give a glimpse into the exponential nature of the circle.
$$ i^{0} = 1 i^{1} = i i^{2} = -1 i^{3} = i^{2} cdot i^{1} = -i i^{4} = i^{2} cdot i^{2} = -1 cdot -1 = 1 i^{5} = i^{4} cdot i^{1} = i i^{6} = -1 i^{7} = -i i^{8} = 1 $$
The pattern $ 1, i, -1, -i $ keeps repeating. If this pattern is mapped onto the unit circle it forms a linear scale around the circumference where every unit step on the scale represents a quarter turn on the circle. This pattern also works in the negative direction.
$$ i^{-1} = i^{3}/i^{4} = -i i^{-2} = i^{2}/i^{4} = -1 i^{-3} = i^{1}/i^{4} = i i^{-4} = 1/i^{4} = 1 $$
Note that the origin on the circumference scale occurs at 1, also called Unity, on the complex plane.
Some Sample Fractional Powers of i
Raising $ i $ to integer powers results in traversing the unit circle in the same number of quarter turns. The next question that arises naturally is if the pattern also applies to fractional values as well. Consider $ sqrt{i} $. Suppose it is $ a + b cdot i $.
$$ ( a + b cdot i )^{2} = i a^{2} + 2ab cdot i + b^{2} cdot i^{2} = i $$
$$ ( a^{2} - b^{2} ) + ( 2ab ) cdot i = 0 + 1 cdot i $$
In order for two complex numbers to be equal, both the real parts and the imaginary parts must be equal.
$ a^{2} - b^{2} = 0 $ and $ 2ab = 1 $
$ a = ± b $ and $ a = { 1 over {2b} } $
Solving for a,b being real yields two solutions:
$ (a,b) = left( { sqrt{2} over 2 }, { sqrt{2} over 2 } right) $ or $ left( - { sqrt{2} over 2 }, - { sqrt{2} over 2 } right) $
Both these points are on the unit circle. The first one is half way between 1 and $ i $. The second one is on the opposite side of the circle. The first one is exactly where it was expected, at the one half mark on the circumference scale. The second one makes sense if you consider $ i = i^{5} $.
$$ ( i^{5} )^{1/2} = i^{5/2} $$
Five halves on the circumference scale is exactly where the second solution is found. The same results hold for $ i = i^{( 1 + 4 cdot n )} $. No matter what integer value of $ n $ is chosen, the result is a value that places the solution on one of the points already found.
A more dramatic fraction example is finding the cube roots of one.
$$ z^{3} = 1 z^{3} - 1 = 0 ( z - 1 ) cdot ( z^{2} + z + 1 ) = 0 $$ $ z - 1 = 0 $ or $ z^{2} + z + 1 = 0 $
The first equation gives $ z = 1 $. The second equation can be solved using the quadratic formula.
$$ z = { { -1 ± sqrt{ 1^2 - 4 cdot 1 cdot 1 } } over {2 cdot 1} } = { { -1 ± sqrt{ 1 - 4 } } over {2} } $$
Observe 1 86 Circle Ocala
$ z = -{ {1} over {2} } + i cdot { sqrt{ 3 } over {2} } $ or $ z = -{ {1} over {2} } - i cdot { sqrt{ 3 } over {2} } $
All three solutions lie on the unit circle. They are equally spread out and when connected with line segments form an inscribed equilateral triangle. The cube roots of one can be found a different way using the exponential method shown above along the circumference.
$$ 1^{1/3} = ( i^{0} )^{1/3} = i^{0} = 1 1^{1/3} = ( i^{4} )^{1/3} = i^{4/3} 1^{1/3} = ( i^{8} )^{1/3} = i^{8/3} 1^{1/3} = ( i^{12} )^{1/3} = i^{4} = 1 $$
The pattern can be continued in both directions, and like the square root example above, the solutions always fall on the same set of points. This set of points are exactly the same ones found in the Cartesian solution.
$$ i^{4/3} = -1/2 + i cdot sqrt{ 3 }/2 i^{8/3} = -1/2 - i cdot sqrt{ 3 }/2 $$
Exponential Behavior
Since it works for several fractional values, it is not a stretch to assume that it will work for all fractional values. This is not mathematically rigorous, but it appears that raising $ i $ to a scale distance along the circumference to a point yields the complex number at that point. Therefore any point on the unit circle can be reached by raising $ i $ to the appropriate power. This power is not unique, any displacement of an integer multiple of four will also be a solution.
$$ z = i^{p} = i^{( p + 4 cdot n )} $$
This is why the complex unit circle can be seen as being exponential. Furthermore, if two complex numbers on the unit circle are multiplied, the resulting number is located at the sum of the circumference scale values of the two numbers on the unit circle.
$$ z_{1} cdot z_{2} = i^{p_{1}} cdot i^{p_{2}} = i^{( p_{1} + p_{2} )} = z_{3} $$
The consequence of this is that any arbitrary scale can be used. Any point on the unit circle can be defined as one on a scale along the circumference. Then when that complex value is squared it will occur at distance two, cubed will be at distance 3 and so on.
Roots of Unity
When the point is at $ 1/N $ of the circumference, the set of points defined by its integer powers form a special set called the Roots of Unity. Each value at each point, when raised to the $ Nth $ power will be one. When $ N=2 $ you have the square roots of one: 1 and -1. When $ N=3 $ you get the points derived earlier. When $ N=4 $, the roots are $ 1, i, -1, $ and $ -i $. It follows from this that $ i $ raised to any rational number is actually a Root of Unity and that $ i $ raised to an irrational number can never be a Root of Unity.
The Radian Scale
Another very special case of an arbitrary scale is when the unit point is set at one radian. When this is the case, the distance units along the circumference are the same as the distance units of the complex plane and the power scale coincides with radian angle measures. Suppose we call the value at one radian $ u $. The Cartesian value is easily determinable.
$$ u = cos( 1 ) + i cdot sin( 1 ) $$
Since the power scale coincides with radian angles the following equation will also be true.
$$ u^{theta} = cos( theta ) + i cdot sin( theta ) $$
The right hand side of this equation is identical to the right hand side of Euler's equation. It gives the value of the complex number on the unit circle for a given angle of $ theta $. The left hand side of the equation gives the location of the point on the unit circle defined by the distance along the circumference.
From the left hand side of Euler's equation:
$$ u^{theta} = e^{itheta} = ( e^{i} )^{theta} $$
This reveals that the real meaning of Euler's equation is that it functions as a translation of a distance along the circumference of a point on the complex unit circle to the complex value of the point on the complex plane.
The Point at One Radian
Raising both sides to $ 1/theta $ (or setting $ theta = 1 $) leads to:
$$ u = e^{i} $$
By setting $ theta = pi/2 $ in the first $ u^{theta} $ equation it becomes:
Observe 1 86 Circle Summerfield
$$ u^{pi/2} = i $$
Raising both sides to $ 2/pi $ gives:
$$ u = i^{2/pi} $$
Equating the two expressions for $ u $.
$$ e^{i} = i^{2/pi} $$
Isn't that interesting? A real number raised to an imaginary power that equals an imaginary number raised to a real power in a simple equation involving the three fundamental constants of math: $ e, i, $ and $ pi $. Of course, the generalized version isn't as pretty ($ m $ and $ n $ are integers):
$$ e^{icdot( 1 + 2picdot m )} = i^{( 2/pi + 4n )} $$
All the generalization does is introduce multiple representations for the same point.
The Traditional Proof of Euler's Equation
Euler's equation is traditionally proved using the Taylor series expansions for the included functions. They are:
$$ e^x = 1 + x + { x^2 over 2 } + { x^3 over {3!} } + { x^4 over {4!} } + { x^5 over {5!} } + { x^6 over {6!} } + { x^7 over {7!} } + .... $$ $$ cos(x) = 1 - { x^2 over 2 } + { x^4 over {4!} } - { x^6 over {6!} } + { x^8 over {8!} } + .... $$ $$ sin(x) = x - { x^3 over {3!} } + { x^5 over {5!} } - { x^7 over {7!} } + { x^9 over {9!} } + .... $$
The similarities in the three formulas should be readily apparent. Cosine is an even function, so all its powers are even. Likewise, Sine is an odd function so all its powers are the odd numbers.
The proof is straightforward. Substitute $ itheta $ for $ x $ in the first series.
$$ e^{itheta} = 1 + itheta + { (itheta)^2 over 2 } + { (itheta)^3 over {3!} } + { (itheta)^4 over {4!} } + { (itheta)^5 over {5!} } + { (itheta)^6 over {6!} } + { (itheta)^7 over {7!} } + .... $$
Next, factor out the powers of $ i $ and reduce them to their simplest form.
$$ e^{itheta} = 1 + itheta - { {theta}^2 over 2 } - i cdot { {theta}^3 over {3!} } + { {theta}^4 over {4!} } + i cdot { {theta}^5 over {5!} } - { {theta}^6 over {6!} } - i cdot { {theta}^7 over {7!} } + .... $$
Separate the real and the imaginary terms.
$$ e^{itheta} = left[ 1 - { {theta}^2 over 2 } + { {theta}^4 over {4!} } - { {theta}^6 over {6!} } + .... right] + i cdot left[ theta - { {theta}^3 over {3!} } + { {theta}^5 over {5!} } - { {theta}^7 over {7!} } + .... right] $$
Finally, substitute back in the function definitions for the series.
$$ e^{itheta} = cos( theta ) + i cdot sin( theta ) $$
Quite easily done. This proof doesn't give any hint of the relationship of the equation to the complex unit circle, but it does have the advantage of proving the equation is valid for all values.
Rescaling to the i Scale
Euler's equation is radian based. It can be converted to the $ i $ scale with some simple substitutions.
$$ e^{itheta} = (e^{i})^{theta} = (i^{2/pi})^{theta} = i^{{2 over {pi}} cdot theta} $$
This suggests the following substitution.
$$ p = {2 over {pi}} cdot theta $$
Solve for $ theta $.
$$ theta = {{pi} over 2} cdot p $$
Substitute these expressions into Euler's formula to get an equivalent $ i $ scale based formula.
$$ i^p = cos( {{pi} over 2} cdot p ) + i cdot sin( {{pi} over 2} cdot p ) $$
This formula validates the assumption made earlier that the $ i $ based circumference power scale works for fractional values. Since $ pi/2 $ is a right angle, it also confirms that each unit step on the power scale represents a quarter turn on the complex unit circle.
Conclusion
Euler's magnificent equation relates the distance along the circumference of the complex unit circle to the underlying complex value. That this relationship is essentially exponential is not really intuitive. Knowing that the complex unit circle is inherently exponential in its behavior and that the radian scale, used by Euler's equation, is just one scale of many, makes the equation more understandable. Anytime ( e^{ i cdot something } ) appears in a formula, it means somehow the formula is referring to a point on the complex unit circle in some context.
If you found this article interesting, you may like its followup: Angle Addition Formulas from Euler's Formula
Next post by Cedron Dawg:DFT Graphical Interpretation: Centroids of Weighted Roots of Unity